OPINION: Increasing minimum wage is a short-term solution for a long-term problem
Those expected to benefit will suffer when minimum wage increases to $15 per hour.
The supply of workers and businesses’ demand for workers determines the price of labor. The law of supply suggests that as prices increase, the amount of people looking for work will increase. The law of demand indicates that as the price of individual units of labor increases, the amount of labor a business demands decreases. Minimum wage restricts the supply and demand of the labor market.
An invisible hand guides supply and demand toward an intersection known as “market equilibrium.” This point is where employers and employees receive and consume the highest level of production. Moral philosopher Adam Smith outlines the invisible hand theory in his book “The Wealth of Nations” and asserts government interference with unintended consequences.
Lawmakers and academics say increasing minimum wage can alleviate the suffering of the working poor. Should the minimum wage rise above market equilibrium, unemployment will rise because labor supplied increases while labor demanded decreases.
The invisible hand has not found the market equilibrium, it implies that increasing minimum wage enables market efficiency because it brings demand closer to equilibrium. This causes demand for goods and services from other markets to increase, which leads to higher prices.
Minimum wage causes a temporary increase in GDP, until employers increase prices to prevent inventory loss and higher profits. The long-run supply suggests that supply side inflation will wipe out gains made by minimum wage. Short-term growth from demand accounts for no increase in the supply of goods demanded.
Minimum wage must continue to increase for wages to keep pace with inflation, which causes negative externalities for businesses. Inflation affects creditors because inflation wipes out return on investment and favors debtors over the creditors. This may slow economic development because businesses now lack financiers to invest in their business’ expansion.
When companies expand, they require more workers to manage accounts and run their business efficiently. If capital flow is restricted by inflation, less wealth is created, leading to fewer opportunities.
As noted in “The Wealth of Nations,” policies done with good intentions have unintended consequences. A minimum wage hike is a proposal that sounds good on paper, but lacks evidence to support its success. Supporters use the “appeal to pity” fallacy to validate their claims.
Knowledge and skill determine wages, which explains why underwater welders earn more than entry-level employees. Many can flip a burger, yet few wield the skill to weld. Minimum wage typically fills entry-level positions by providing knowledge and skills for those entering the labor force. Workers take with them the knowledge and skills and apply them to better paying jobs. These jobs pay higher wages because of the knowledge employees have. The process continues and wealth is accumulated as workers develop specialized skills. Nineteenth century Scottish immigrant and industrialist Andrew Carnegie noted, “The first third of your life should be spent learning all you can, the next third earning as much as you can, and the last third should be spent giving it all away.”
Carnegie’s example is worth mentioning because he came from poverty, but amounted to one of the richest individuals throughout history. It is a mischaracterization of capitalism to suggest that people get rich through exploitation. Bill Gates is derived from providing products people wanted, not robbing consumers and workers of their dignity. While some Microsoft workers struggle to make ends meet, increasing minimum wage will not change reality because scarcity determines labors value.
We hope you appreciate this article! Before you move on, our student staff wanted to ask if you would consider supporting The Appalachian's award-winning journalism. We are celebrating our 90th anniversary of The Appalachian in October 2024!
We receive funding from the university, which helps us to compensate our students for the work they do for The Appalachian. However, the bulk of our operational expenses — from printing and website hosting to training and entering our work into competitions — is dependent upon advertising revenue and donations. We cannot exist without the financial and educational support of our fellow departments on campus, our local and regional businesses, and donations of money and time from alumni, parents, subscribers and friends.
Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest, both on campus and within the community. From anywhere in the world, readers can access our paywall-free journalism, through our website, through our email newsletter, and through our social media channels. Our supporters help to keep us editorially independent, user-friendly, and accessible to everyone.
If you can, please consider supporting us with a financial gift from $10. We appreciate your consideration and support of student journalism at Appalachian State University. If you prefer to make a tax-deductible donation, or if you would prefer to make a recurring monthly gift, please give to The Appalachian Student News Fund through the university here: https://securelb.imodules.com/s/1727/cg20/form.aspx?sid=1727&gid=2&pgid=392&cid=1011&dids=418.15&bledit=1&sort=1.