The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

Newsletter Signup

Get our news delivered straight to your inbox every week.

* indicates required

Indie is a bad word

The+Appalachian+Online
The Appalachian Online

“The Witness” is a game that puts players on a carefully crafted and beautifully rendered island with hundreds of thoughtful, intricate puzzles. The game takes upward of 40 hours to complete, a long game by any measure.

Then why is it called an indie game?

“Call of Duty” is a game series that features recycled gameplay, swift campaigns and stale plot progression that can be completed in an afternoon.

Then why is it called an AAA game?

An indie game is defined as a game with little funding, a small team, an online-only release or a combination of the three. An AAA game, on the other hand, is described as being a big blockbuster production, similar in scope to movies in a theater.

These descriptions, though, are woefully outdated.

Before the 2000s, video games of commercial success were created by teams of people working on advanced computers over the course of years. The degree of difficulty in programming and computer engineering required to make games economically viable kept many people out of the industry, isolating ideas from the public.

In the last 10 years, however, the power of personal computing and the licensing of game engines has provided a software framework that removes the significant programming knowledge barrier to make games. Now, anyone with a computer and a passion can make their own game.

These new games were small in scope and not very impressive. They were called indie in reference to indie bands and movies that fill the same role of a smaller, more personal product.

“Minecraft” is the perfect example of an indie game.

Created by one man with simple textures, basic physics and rudimentary crafting mechanics, the game was hardly impressive. It was certainly a game that would have gone unnoticed 30 years ago.

But because Minecraft was able to be sold over the internet, it began to gain popularity and thus, bring in more money. This money was used to improve and expand the gameplay mechanics and crafting elements – eventually becoming the game that Microsoft acquired the rights to for $2.5 billion.

For comparison, Disney bought the rights to Star Wars for $4 billion.

This overnight success isn’t typical of an indie game, but shows the potential power of those deals.

The reason Minecraft is so popular is because it is so different from traditional AAA games. It offers something that no big name developer or publisher would dare create.

This is the true strength of indie games: the ability to create unique experiences that AAA games cannot deliver. This is why they have become rapidly popular in the last few years. Indie developers can get their games out to market without having to pay the traditional fees of publishers, and as a result indie games can be made more technically impressive and larger in scale.

This escalation of scale in indie games is what gives us “The Witness” and “Life is Strange,” games that are quite possibly the best ones of the year. These games make players feel emotionally moved and deeply engaged much more than “Call of Duty,” yet are dubbed “indie.”

How can something so special be compared to those simple publicly made games that first coined the term? It is simply unjust.

Indie games are not just here to stay, but to thrive. As the differences between indie and AAA go away, so too will the differentiation between the words.

A term that was once lovingly given to aspiring game developers is now branded on projects to diminish their prestige. This needs to stop.

Hebert, a junior journalism major from Greensboro, is an A&E reporter.

Donate to The Appalachian
$1271
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal

We hope you appreciate this article! Before you move on, our student staff wanted to ask if you would consider supporting The Appalachian's award-winning journalism. We are celebrating our 90th anniversary of The Appalachian in 2024!

We receive funding from the university, which helps us to compensate our students for the work they do for The Appalachian. However, the bulk of our operational expenses — from printing and website hosting to training and entering our work into competitions — is dependent upon advertising revenue and donations. We cannot exist without the financial and educational support of our fellow departments on campus, our local and regional businesses, and donations of money and time from alumni, parents, subscribers and friends.

Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest, both on campus and within the community. From anywhere in the world, readers can access our paywall-free journalism, through our website, through our email newsletter, and through our social media channels. Our supporters help to keep us editorially independent, user-friendly, and accessible to everyone.

If you can, please consider supporting us with a financial gift from $10. We appreciate your consideration and support of student journalism at Appalachian State University. If you prefer to make a tax-deductible donation, or if you would prefer to make a recurring monthly gift, please give to The Appalachian Student News Fund through the university here: https://securelb.imodules.com/s/1727/cg20/form.aspx?sid=1727&gid=2&pgid=392&cid=1011&dids=418.15&bledit=1&sort=1.

Donate to The Appalachian
$1271
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal