The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

Newsletter Signup

Get our news delivered straight to your inbox every week.

* indicates required

‘Desolation’ succeeds as Jackson’s bombastic, irresistible vision

Desolation succeeds as Jacksons bombastic, irresistible vision

Nary an Internet chatroom was spared the collective, exasperated groans of the Tolkien faithful when it was announced that the fiercely anticipated upcoming “Hobbit” film series would be split into not two, but three chapters.

Suffice it to say, the wailing fanbase did have a point. Look what happened with “The Godfather III”, “Return of the Jedi”, “The Matrix Revolutions”, “Spiderman 3”, “X-Men: The Last Stand” and countless others – though for the sake of argument I’ll put “Return of the King” out of mind for a moment.The_Hobbit_-_The_Desolation_of_Smaug_theatrical_poster

More often than not, third movies end up as the dumping ground for ideas that never made it into the first two installments of the trilogy in question.

“The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug” is only the second in the “Hobbit” series, but it follows the pattern of material being concentrated in the first two chapters, which is concerning for Tolkien fans when the source material is so slim.

One change – which, admittedly, most consider an improvement – is that where 2012’s “The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey” seemed to be stretched too thin, “Desolation of Smaug” is stuffed to the gills.

The abundant action sequences are better choreographed and more exciting than – dare I say it – even anything in the “Lord of the Rings” trilogy. Peter Jackson’s Middle Earth thrives in detail, thanks again to splendid, digitally enhanced New Zealand. The plot skips along so nicely that even the most casual fan might not mind the near three hour runtime.

The biggest issue with “Smaug” isn’t the concentration of the material, but the quality thereof.
Too many subplots focus on characters that were an afterthought at best, if not wholly nonexistent in Tolkien’s beloved classic. Legolas, reprised by a less-spry Orlando Bloom, appears only to serve as jealous lover of Tauriel, another artificially-injected, sex-appeal token played by Evangeline Lilly. Kili, a handsome dwarf, steals both our hearts and screen time as the wounded hero and final element in the film’s highly unnecessary love triangle.

All this goes to say that there’s a lot of fluff, so much that even the iconic scenes derived cleanly from the source novel – for example the run-in with the shapeshifting Beorn – come off as breaks in the primary action: the retrieval of one mysterious and inexplicably important “Arkenstone.”

That said, Smaug the Stupendous is entirely captivating. Rising superstar actor Benedict Cumberbatch breathes fire into the eponymous serpentine villain with all the fiery charisma one could hope for.

Every great fantasy film needs an iconic villain, and Cumberbatch’s Smaug makes for a refreshing change over the duller Azog who sent our stout travelers scattering throughout “An Unexpected Journey.” Though this middle slice of the journey is as delightfully rough-and-tumble as the first, an injection of invigorating motivation makes the difference here.

Though “Desolation,” like “Unexpected Journey” before it, more or less fails as a direct adaptation, the irresistible draw of Middle Earth is inescapable. I’ll whine with the best of them about Jackson’s liberty taking, but by the time the credits roll, I’m still in love with this marvelous film world.

Rating: three-and-a-half out of five stars

Story by Sam Lineberger, A&E Reporter

Leave a Comment
Donate to The Appalachian
$1500
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal

We hope you appreciate this article! Before you move on, our student staff wanted to ask if you would consider supporting The Appalachian's award-winning journalism. We are celebrating our 90th anniversary of The Appalachian in 2024!

We receive funding from the university, which helps us to compensate our students for the work they do for The Appalachian. However, the bulk of our operational expenses — from printing and website hosting to training and entering our work into competitions — is dependent upon advertising revenue and donations. We cannot exist without the financial and educational support of our fellow departments on campus, our local and regional businesses, and donations of money and time from alumni, parents, subscribers and friends.

Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest, both on campus and within the community. From anywhere in the world, readers can access our paywall-free journalism, through our website, through our email newsletter, and through our social media channels. Our supporters help to keep us editorially independent, user-friendly, and accessible to everyone.

If you can, please consider supporting us with a financial gift from $10. We appreciate your consideration and support of student journalism at Appalachian State University. If you prefer to make a tax-deductible donation, or if you would prefer to make a recurring monthly gift, please give to The Appalachian Student News Fund through the university here: https://securelb.imodules.com/s/1727/cg20/form.aspx?sid=1727&gid=2&pgid=392&cid=1011&dids=418.15&bledit=1&sort=1.

Donate to The Appalachian
$1500
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All The Appalachian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *