The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

The Student News Site of Appalachian State University

The Appalachian

Newsletter Signup

Get our news delivered straight to your inbox every week.

* indicates required

Chapel Hill tragedy reveals our warped understanding of terrorism

The+Appalachian+Online
The Appalachian Online

The murder of three Muslim students at Chapel Hill has forced us to once again face our cultural ideas about terrorism and Muslims.

Understandable questions arose following the murders. Why has the accused murderer Craig Hicks not been labelled a terrorist? If he were a Muslim and the victims non-Muslim, would the reporting and perception not be different?

Should accused murderer Craig Hicks be seen as terrorist? I do not really know at this point. Terrorism is difficult to define, but the FBI definition, which requires that an act must “appear intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population,” among other requirements, would be appropriate.

At this point, I am not sure we can say that he intended to intimidate the larger civilian population at Chapel Hill. This uncertainty does not makes the murders no less heinous, but is important in how we conceptualize what happened.

The larger, more important point this line of questioning raises is unfortunately valid. No honest, objective person can say that the reporting would not have been different had a Muslim been the one charged with the crime.

Terrorism and Islam are far too often equated in the minds of Americans. Thinking of all Muslims as terrorists is wrong, dangerous and counterproductive in our fight against the extremists who are truly a threat.

This is the problem with the idea of terrorism. As a December 2014 article in the Netherlands International Law Review pointed out, there is no “uniform and comprehensive definition of terrorism at the international level.”

Terrorism, with its lack of formal, international definition and high emotional impact, can be manipulated by those in power to create fear.

Definitions of terrorism are notoriously self-serving. Part of the reason there is no international definition is that nations were concerned about “the use of violence in the context of conflicts over national liberation and self-determination,” according to a 2002 brief written for the Australian parliament.

The terrorism label is useful for oppressive nations wishing to de-legitimize popular resistance and we still have not come to a firm conclusion on the terrorist versus freedom fighter issue.

Still, the idea of terrorism is a necessary one. There should be some word to describe the tactics of those ideologically motivated groups and individuals who commit violence with certain goals in mind. That type of action should be seen as its own particular brand of violence.

How exactly we deal with the idea appropriately is challenge. The number of competing interests and agendas of nations around the world makes it unlikely that a universal definition will gain acceptance.

Perhaps the best route is for the American people to start questioning the accuracy of how we perceive terrorism and the emotional effects of that word.

I hope the tragic incident in Chapel Hill and the way it defies our expectations of how these acts of violence happen can help us overcome some of our misguided ideas about terrorism.

Griffin, a junior journalism major from Madison, is an opinion writer.

STORY: Kevin Griffin, Opinion Writer

Leave a Comment
Donate to The Appalachian
$1500
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal

We hope you appreciate this article! Before you move on, our student staff wanted to ask if you would consider supporting The Appalachian's award-winning journalism. We are celebrating our 90th anniversary of The Appalachian in 2024!

We receive funding from the university, which helps us to compensate our students for the work they do for The Appalachian. However, the bulk of our operational expenses — from printing and website hosting to training and entering our work into competitions — is dependent upon advertising revenue and donations. We cannot exist without the financial and educational support of our fellow departments on campus, our local and regional businesses, and donations of money and time from alumni, parents, subscribers and friends.

Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest, both on campus and within the community. From anywhere in the world, readers can access our paywall-free journalism, through our website, through our email newsletter, and through our social media channels. Our supporters help to keep us editorially independent, user-friendly, and accessible to everyone.

If you can, please consider supporting us with a financial gift from $10. We appreciate your consideration and support of student journalism at Appalachian State University. If you prefer to make a tax-deductible donation, or if you would prefer to make a recurring monthly gift, please give to The Appalachian Student News Fund through the university here: https://securelb.imodules.com/s/1727/cg20/form.aspx?sid=1727&gid=2&pgid=392&cid=1011&dids=418.15&bledit=1&sort=1.

Donate to The Appalachian
$1500
$5000
Contributed
Our Goal

Comments (0)

All The Appalachian Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *